A former NBA player has ignited debate by claiming Steph Curry intentionally left Cade Cunningham off his All-NBA ballot. Is there more to the All-NBA voting process than meets the eye?
—
Steph Curry’s Alleged Snub of Cade Cunningham Raises Eyebrows
The NBA All-NBA team selections are meant to honor the league’s elite players, but this year’s process has sparked fresh controversy. Former NBA player and analyst Jarrett Matthews voiced a bold claim on a popular sports podcast, stating that Golden State Warriors superstar Steph Curry may have deliberately omitted Detroit Pistons guard Cade Cunningham from his All-NBA picks. Matthews described the omission as “more personal than performance-based,” suggesting deeper rifts or unspoken politics within the league.
Former NBA Veteran Hints at Behind-the-Scenes Tension sJarrett Matthews, who spent a decade in the league, didn’t mince words in his criticism. “Cade had an All-NBA season, no question. Curry leaving him off says more about internal rivalries than actual performance,” Matthews said. This assertion has sparked discussion among fans and analysts alike, who are now questioning the transparency and objectivity of the All-NBA voting process. Matthews also hinted that Curry’s influence as a top-tier superstar might skew the perception of rising talent like Cunningham. Cade Cunningham’s Breakout Season Deserved Recognition Cade Cunningham’s 2024–25 campaign was statistically impressive. He averaged 24.7 points, 7.9 assists, and 5.2 rebounds per game while significantly improving his efficiency and leadership. Under his guidance, the Detroit Pistons showed real progress, moving from bottom-dwellers to playoff contenders. Many in the NBA community believe that Cunningham’s omission from the All-NBA list was unwarranted, especially when compared to the inclusion of players with similar or lesser contributions.
Steph Curry Remains Silent Amid Growing Backlash
Despite the mounting backlash, Steph Curry has remained publicly silent. Warriors representatives declined to comment, and Curry himself has neither confirmed nor denied the allegation. This silence has only fueled speculation about whether personal biases influenced his All-NBA ballot. While players are not required to make their votes public, many are calling for greater accountability and transparency from those who have the privilege of casting votes that influence careers, bonuses, and reputations.
All-NBA Voting: Fair System or Flawed Popularity Contest? The controversy brings renewed scrutiny to the All-NBA voting system. With votes coming from both media and select players, some argue that the process is too subjective. Player rivalries, media narratives, and regional loyalties can all potentially skew results. Matthews’ claim adds fuel to the debate over whether players should have a say in All-NBA honors if personal agendas can cloud judgment. The NBA may need to revisit its criteria to ensure fairness, especially for rising stars like Cade Cunningham. What’s Next for Cade Cunningham and the NBA Voting System?Cunningham has not commented on the situation, choosing instead to focus on his off-season training. However, fans and insiders believe the slight could be a motivating factor for the young star heading into next season. As the NBA continues to evolve, so too must its recognition systems. If the league wants to maintain the integrity of its honors, addressing potential flaws in the voting process — and ensuring transparency among voters like Steph Curry — is essential.
Target Keywords:
Steph Curry All-NBA snub
Cade Cunningham All-NBA
NBA voting Controversy NBA All-NBA team 2025 Steph Curry vs Cade Cunningham SEO Tags: title>Steph Curry’s All-NBA Snub of Cade Cunningham Sparks Controversy /title meta name=”description” Content “A former NBA player accuses Steph Curry of deliberately excluding Cade Cunningham from the All-NBA team. Discover the full story behind the controversy.” Let me know if you’d like this turned into a blog format, HTML code, or visual layout.
Leave a Reply