The Seattle Seahawks fired Ryan Grubb shortly after the season ended. With that, the franchise began the quest for a new offensive commander.
The OC role in Seattle seems pretty fascinating. Whoever takes over would most likely have complete control of the offense, as if he were an Offensive Head Coach, much like Dan Quinn did with Kyle Shanahan in Atlanta. Coaches may sincerely seek this independence.
Let’s go!
The challenge of becoming an offensive coordinator in the NFL.
Grubb appeared to be in the wrong place at the wrong moment, but I feel he has the ability to be a big player in the NFL in a few years. He needed to go from college to the NFL.
while leading the entire offensive. That’s the issue: you may be an exceptional positional coach without being a terrific offensive coordinator. Consider Shane Waldron as an example. As much as some fans despised his stint in Seattle, he was unquestionably a dynamic player with contemporary offensive tendencies. However, being an OC necessitates the ability to communicate effectively with your players. Also, the main characteristic is to read the game, devise an adaptation strategy, and put it into action during the game. How many times have we seen the Seahawks make the same mistakes throughout a game, with no adjustments?
Another issue is responsibility. We frequently see a positional coach being appointed to the OC job. However, calling plays is a hard art. Also, when you see a unit’s accomplishment, you should know who deserves credit so that you are not shocked by a Nathaniel Hackett. He was promoted to Head Coach after excelling as the Green Bay Packers’ offensive coordinator. His season with the Broncos was disastrous, and then he was the Jets’ offensive coordinator, which was equally bad. Clearly, Matt Lafleur deserves credit for the offense’s success.
Leave a Reply